Danh mục
| Đơn vị phát hành | Holmoi |
|---|---|
| Năm | 380 BC - 375 BC |
| Loại | Standard circulation coin |
| Mệnh giá | Hemiobol (1⁄12) |
| Tiền tệ | Drachm |
| Chất liệu | Silver |
| Trọng lượng | 0.26 g |
| Đường kính | 7.5 mm |
| Độ dày | |
| Hình dạng | Round (irregular) |
| Kỹ thuật | Hammered |
| Hướng | |
| Nghệ nhân khắc | |
| Lưu hành đến | |
| Tài liệu tham khảo | SNG France#122 |
| Mô tả mặt trước | Helmeted head of Athena facing right |
|---|---|
| Chữ viết mặt trước | |
| Chữ khắc mặt trước | |
| Mô tả mặt sau | Laureate head of Apollo Sarpedonios facing right |
| Chữ viết mặt sau | |
| Chữ khắc mặt sau | |
| Cạnh | |
| Xưởng đúc | |
| Số lượng đúc |
ND (380 BC - 375 BC) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 1809712200 |
| Thông tin bổ sung |
Historical Context: This silver hemiobol, struck by the obscure city-state of Holmoi between 380 and 375 BC, offers a rare numismatic window into a minor Greek polis's economic life during the early Classical period. Likely situated in Messenia or Arcadia, Holmoi's coinage issuance signifies political and economic autonomy amidst post-Peloponnesian War power shifts. Such minute denominations were crucial for daily transactions, underscoring the necessity for local currency. Its scarcity (SNG France#122) elevates its importance for understanding regional trade and monetary practices beyond major centers.
Artistry: The artistic execution, typical for a minor mint, reflects prevailing Early Classical stylistic conventions. The engraver, common for issues of this scale, remains anonymous. Given the diminutive 7.5 mm flan, the design would have been compact and symbolic, likely featuring a localized deity or civic emblem on the obverse, and a simpler device or monogram on the reverse. Rendering legible imagery on such a small canvas necessitated a clear, understated approach, focusing on essential forms rather than intricate detail.
Technical/Grading: Weighing a mere 0.26 grams of silver, this hemiobol represents a significant technical achievement, though prone to inherent minting limitations. Key assessment areas include clarity of central device(s) and any surviving legend, often abbreviated or off-flan due to the small planchet. Full strikes are uncommon; typical examples exhibit off-centering, minor weakness, or slight planchet irregularities. The fabric would be consistent with hammered coinage of the era. High-points for grading focus on sharpness of primary motifs and overall legibility.